|
to comment
In the section "to comment" the FWF publishes from time to
time position papers and invites the interested public to comment these
documents.
Your opinion is important to us. With this measure the FWF seeks to make a contribution
to the culture of discurs in the field of science policy issues in Austria.
For Download please click on the pdf symbol.
 |
|
|
| position paper |
PDF
|
Contact
|
| |
|
|
Types of research output profiles. A multilevel latent class analysis of the Austrian Science Fund’s final project report data
Rüdiger Mutz, Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel (2012) in: Research Evaluation (2012) pp. 1-16 |
|
Falk Reckling |
| |
|
|
Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach
Rüdiger Mutz, Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel (2012) in: PLoS ONE 7(10): e48509.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048509 |
|
Falk Reckling |
| |
|
|
Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review? An Empirical Investigation Using the Example of the Austrian Science Fund
Rüdiger Mutz, Lutz Bornmann, Hans-Dieter Daniel in: Zeitschrift für Psychologie 2012; Vol. 220(2):121-129 |
|
Falk Reckling |
| |
|
|
| Factors Influencing Approval Probability in FWF Decision-Making Procedures |
|
Falk Reckling |
| |
|
|
A contest between nations; or how far is Austrian research behind
that of the world leaders?
An analysis on the competivness of Austria's scientific research
in the natural and social sciences |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Exzellenzcluster wissenschaftlicher
Forschung |
|
|
|